Many other players may have been auditioning for Bafana Bafana World Cup spots but the likes of Mbekezeli Mbokazi, Aubrey Modiba, Teboho Mokwena and to some extent, Jayden Adams, are sure case for the Americas.
Image: AYANDA NDAMANE/Independent Newspapers
There is a temptation to view the latest Bafana Bafana squad as experimental — a mix of surprise inclusions, notable omissions and unfamiliar combinations.
That perception has only been reinforced by results on the pitch.
A draw in the opening friendly against the Panama national football team showed promise but also frustration, with South Africa creating chances but failing to convert dominance into victory.
Days later, a defeat in the return fixture in Cape Town offered a harsher lesson — control means little without cutting edge.
On the surface, those outcomes suggest a team still searching for answers. But that reading may miss the point entirely.
Because if there is one thing Hugo Broos has shown during his time in charge, it is that he is not a coach who guesses. He decides. And more often than not, he decides early.
The current camp has been framed as a period of auditions — a chance for fringe players to stake their claim ahead of the World Cup.
But in reality, these are not auditions in the traditional sense.They are confirmations. Broos already has his core.
You see it in the consistency of certain selections, the trust placed in key figures, and the clarity with which roles are defined within the team.
Players like Ronwen Williams remain untouchable, not because of reputation alone, but because they fit the system the coach has carefully built.
What we are witnessing now is not a search for answers — it is a process of validation.
Even the more debated decisions, such as the omission of Sipho Chaine and the inclusion of Renaldo Leaner, fall within this logic. It is not about discovering Leaner.
It is about confirming whether he can be trusted within the structure Broos already believes in. The same applies across the squad.
New faces are not being introduced because the coach is unsure — they are being tested against a standard that has already been set.
Can they cope with the tactical demands? Can they handle the pressure? Can they maintain the identity Broos wants?
If the answer is no, they will not be part of the final group.
If it is yes, they strengthen the depth of a squad that is already taking shape.This is what makes the current phase so revealing.
The illusion of opportunity exists, but the margins are tighter than they appear.
There is no open competition for every position.
There are, instead, a few remaining questions — and a limited number of players being given one last chance to answer them.
It is a subtle but important distinction.
Because while supporters debate selections and call for different combinations, Broos is operating with a far clearer picture in mind.
His focus is not on building a squad from scratch. It is on refining one.
That is why performances in these friendlies carry such weight. Not because they will completely reshape the team, but because they will confirm — or challenge — the coach’s existing beliefs.
And when the time comes to name the squad for the World Cup, there will be fewer surprises than many expect.
Because in truth, the decisions are already being made.What we are seeing now is simply the final layer of proof.
Related Topics: